As the European football season moves toward its peak with Cup Finals and hard-battled definitive association coordinates with that sort out victors, survivors, and washouts, it is time back to think back out of frustration. In case you're a genuine fan, and follow each round of your number one group, knowing the abilities and failings of every player, you will have a lot to be irate about.
You will be angry with the various choices by arbitrators and their group that have conflicted with the football crew you support. You will be angered with choices made for the rival group, particularly when the TV screens in a split second replay the occasion, representing in lively shading the choice wasn't right.
You will meet with your companions in the bar, watch the replay, remember the game and revile boisterously at the various helpless choices. Besides, you will be furious there is no way around it, and you'll ask why the different Football Associations don't make a move.
Your indignation will be essentially aimed at the official, likely in uproarious voice during the match, yet while you're reviling his uncouthness there are issues you should likewise consider:
1. The ref can just put together his choices with respect to the OK proof gave
2. The rundown of satisfactory proof does exclude that of TV slow-movement replays
3. In the 90 or something like that minutes of each match, an arbitrator can settle on many choices dependent on proof saw by the natural eye, and many suppositions from his linesmen and fourth authority.
...also, this implies 100% precision is unimaginable.
The game of tennis defeated this issue with an electronic gadget giving 100% precise choices in regards to the ball leaving play, yet the Football Associations won't think about comparable alternatives, not to mention test them.
"The entryway is shut. The choice was made not to utilize innovation by any means," FIFA general secretary Jerome Valcke expressed in March 2010, dismissing the utilization of innovation as a help to the ref.วิเคราะห์ บอลเต็ง
One needs to ask why.
The sport of football has everything to acquire from electronic help:
1. 100% precision on objectives; knowing whether the ball goes too far.
2. 100% precision on when the ball has left play
3. 100% exactness on offsides
4. Visual proof of all fouls from different point, prompting 100% exactness on choices
5. The decrease and possible end of 'cheating' to win or lose a game
6. The decrease and possible end of 'fixed' matches by players
The game has nothing to lose, the Football Associations have nothing to lose (supposedly), thus it gives off an impression of being an easy decision.
On the off chance that the Football Associations will not think about an electronic choice, they should give an OK motivation behind why or leave themselves open to the guess that they're profiting from the current circumstance.